Libertarian's Forum
Libertarian Forum to discuss politics and free market economics.
Libertarian's ForumLibertarian's ForumFreedom Forum › Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression (Read 81 times)
Little Big Man
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 6352
Location: Republic of Me
Joined: Sep 11th, 2017
Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:15pm
Print Post  
But occupying a foreign country that has asked you to leave is.

What the heck are we even talking about this for?

If we stay in Iraq against their will, we might as well announce that we will treat any Muslim country any way we want as long as it helps us to protect Israel and the oil supply.  If we could just admit that protecting Israel at the behest of the Zionist lobby and the Evangelical movement is the real goal of our missions in the middle east, we could simply move the troops into Israel.  They would be the ideal human shields, especially since so many Israelis are taking the same position as the American left, "Radical Muslims ain't so bad."

Pulling out completely is the better plan.  If Iran ever does develop a nuclear bomb, those keystone terrorists could never get it to the states.  Even if they could, they know Iran would be a glass covered parking lot if they did.

The continued U.S. presence in Iraq, having been ordered out by the democratically elected parliament and prime minister will be an ideal recruiting tool for getting Iraqis to join with Iran.  It might even bring the Sunnis and the Shi'ites together for once.
  

Snarky no more!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kaz
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Minarchist

Posts: 10367
Location: Kazmania
Joined: Jun 6th, 2017
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #1 - Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:43pm
Print Post  
Little Big Man wrote on Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:15pm:
But occupying a foreign country that has asked you to leave is.

What the heck are we even talking about this for?

If we stay in Iraq against their will, we might as well announce that we will treat any Muslim country any way we want as long as it helps us to protect Israel and the oil supply


The world spins, and so does the sock.

The Iraqi parliament had a vote which they KNEW was symbolic when they did it.

I agreed with Chief when he said let's take the opportunity to get the hell out of dodge anyway.

But this that Iraq as a country told us to leave is just a lie.  They have the power to do that, and haven't done it.

Again, if you want to say let's take the chance to leave anyway, Chief and I both already agreed with that.  But don't lie and misrepresent the facts, maam
  

Contest winner:  I predicted Kaz' meltdown
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kaz
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Minarchist

Posts: 10367
Location: Kazmania
Joined: Jun 6th, 2017
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #2 - Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:45pm
Print Post  
Little Big Man wrote on Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:15pm:
The continued U.S. presence in Iraq, having been ordered out by the democratically elected parliament and prime minister will be an ideal recruiting tool for getting Iraqis to join with Iran.  It might even bring the Sunnis and the Shi'ites together for once.


Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley

OMG, you know nothing about the Middle East or the dynamics over there ...
  

Contest winner:  I predicted Kaz' meltdown
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Little Big Man
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 6352
Location: Republic of Me
Joined: Sep 11th, 2017
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #3 - Jan 9th, 2020 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
kaz wrote on Jan 9th, 2020 at 1:43pm:
The world spins, and so does the sock.

The Iraqi parliament had a vote which they KNEW was symbolic when they did it.

I agreed with Chief when he said let's take the opportunity to get the hell out of dodge anyway.

But this that Iraq as a country told us to leave is just a lie.  They have the power to do that, and haven't done it.

Again, if you want to say let's take the chance to leave anyway, Chief and I both already agreed with that.  But don't lie and misrepresent the facts, maam


It was only non-binding because the troops were there at the invitation of the prime minister, not of parliament.  Now the prime minister has also asked that we leave.

How many Iraqi officials have to tell us to leave before you admit we aren't welcome there?

  

Snarky no more!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kaz
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Minarchist

Posts: 10367
Location: Kazmania
Joined: Jun 6th, 2017
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #4 - Jan 9th, 2020 at 3:52pm
Print Post  
Little Big Man wrote on Jan 9th, 2020 at 3:35pm:
It was only non-binding because the troops were there at the invitation of the prime minister, not of parliament.  Now the prime minister has also asked that we leave.

How many Iraqi officials have to tell us to leave before you admit we aren't welcome there?



You didn't contradict what I said
  

Contest winner:  I predicted Kaz' meltdown
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
yamcha
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Online

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 2782
Location: Southern California
Joined: Jul 5th, 2019
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #5 - Jan 10th, 2020 at 9:28pm
Print Post  
LBM, the Muslims are extremists and they don't give a shit since Allah will take care of them in heaven.  We never had a problem with them until we (and England) created the Jewish state of Israel which was erected on Jewish lies.  Jews always tell you what happened to them but never why.

We cannot give nukes to those who do not respect life.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 53074
Location: USA
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #6 - Jan 11th, 2020 at 7:19pm
Print Post  
yamcha wrote on Jan 10th, 2020 at 9:28pm:
LBM, the Democratic Socialists are extremists and they don't give a shit...
Fixed that for you. Smiley
  

"Free hate speech"
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Offline

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 53074
Location: USA
Joined: Feb 26th, 2014
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #7 - Jan 11th, 2020 at 7:20pm
Print Post  
yamcha wrote on Jan 10th, 2020 at 9:28pm:
We cannot give nukes to those who do not respect life.
Nukes are those rods that just keep burning? Grin Grin Grin
  

"Free hate speech"
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
yamcha
Libertarian Freedom Member
*****
Online

Libertarian's Forum

Posts: 2782
Location: Southern California
Joined: Jul 5th, 2019
Re: Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Reply #8 - Jan 11th, 2020 at 7:51pm
Print Post  
That's right.  I don't believe in nukes.  However, the only 2 countries that do not accept having the a central jew bank are Iran and North Korea.  Maybe that is why they are our enemies.

The Middle East is a Jewish problem and we need to stop being Zionists.  Let those fukk deal with their own issues and let them wander like they are supposed to.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
 
Libertarian's ForumLibertarian's ForumFreedom Forum › Developing a Nuclear Weapon is Not an Act of Aggression
Libertarian's Forum

Libertarian's Forum Information Rules, Agreement and Privacy Policy